Supernatural John Winchesters Journal

Sam and Dean Winchester know all the secrets their father recorded in his journal. Now you can, too.
On November 2, 1983, Sam and Dean Winchester lost their mother to a demonic supernatural force. In the wake of the tragedy, their father, John, set out to learn everything he could about the paranormal evil that lives in the dark corners and on the back roads of America . . . and how to kill it. In his personal journal, he not only compiled folklore, legend, and superstition about all manner of otherworldly enemies but he also recorded his experiences—hunting the creature that killed his wife even as he raised his two sons.
Part prequel, part resource guide, John Winchester’s Journal finally gives fans the ultimate companion book for Supernatural. It’s all here: the exorcism Sam and Dean used in “Phantom Traveler,” John’s notes on everything from shape-shifters to Samuel Colt, Dean’s first hunt, Sam’s peewee soccer team . . . and John’s single-minded pursuit of a growing and deadly evil.
User Ratings and Reviews
1 Star not worth the money
The book does not agree with facts said on the show. It is not true Supernatural.
3 Stars Not a bad read, just not truthful to the series
I was pretty excited to read my copy of JWJ. I’d heard good things about it and I’m a huge fan of storylines that have to do with John and the Winchester brothers back when they were kids. JWJ seemed like it would a great way to get some backstory.
Unfortunately, it seems that the author got a bit ahead of himself when plotting out that backstory and ignored some crucial bits of characterization as a result. There are several bits of canon that are left out (part of this I can’t blame him for; there are things he might not have known about because they hadn’t been released yet) but more than once what he writes directly contradicts what’s displayed in the show. This is displayed right from the very first paragraph: “I went to Missouri and learned the truth. And from her…” Points to Irvine for remembering the line from Home; unfortunately, he should have remembered that there was NO description of Missouri as a person, hence the surprise on Dean’s part when it came to actually meeting her.
Another thing that got me was just how clearly John’s affection, love and worry for his boys came out. As someone who likes a bit of fluff, that’s always a pleasure to read but as a canon fan, I’ve got to raise the unfortunate issue that neither Sam nor Dean were EVER certain of John’s feelings towards them and had they written proof of the truth, neither would have displayed the level of filial angst we see in the show itself. In a story written from John’s perspective, the proof of his emotions towards his sons would have been fantastic but it just doesn’t work in a book purporting to be the same journal that Sam and Dean take with them on their own journey.
There are several other details that don’t make too much sense to me, but I’ll let readers discover those on their own, rather than pointing them all out. Also, the book has some interesting factoids on the cases that John worked on and I did enjoy the gradual demonstration of his increasing skills (and general coldness, even the slight distraction from his focus on getting vengeance for Mary’s murder as he got more caught up in the hunt itself) as time progressed. If the book had focused more on that instead of on the emotional vulnerabilities, I’d have very easily seen it as John’s journal. As it was, those tidbits were definitely a distraction, especially as we see in canon that John’s journal was extremely succinct and often entries were drilled down to one or two sentences and ALWAYS were focused on the case, not on his own emotional state or those of his sons.
I’d love to see the author actually write a book from John’s perspective, especially if he got someone to work with him on some of the canon details. I think at some point he mentions buying a Mac for Sam, for instance; canon!John would have had NO desire to do this. Apples are expensive and unnecessary for the sort of work they were doing, given that it was in the 96-97 timeframe. A laptop at the time would have been an extreme luxury; paying for a Mac unnecessarily is just too much for me to believe, even on false credit cards, when we have canon proof that money was an issue.
All in all, it’s a decent read. It’s well written, occasionally intriguing, but it does not fit the basic requirements necessary to actually be John Winchester’s Journal.
Buy/More Info